Definition of armed conflict in political science jstor

Understanding Armed Conflict: A Definition in Political Science '1'

In political science, armed conflicts are complex phenomena that involve violence between two or more parties. However, not all violent events qualify as an armed conflict. To define this concept accurately, it is essential to understand the characteristics and distinguishing features of such events.

According to JSTOR research, armed conflict can be described as a large-scale internal struggle within a country where an organized opposition movement has the capability to inflict fatalities on the government '2'. This definition highlights two crucial aspects: scale and organizational structure. The involvement of multiple parties with varying levels of organization is essential in distinguishing armed conflicts from smaller-scale or isolated incidents.

In contrast, political conflict can be understood as a broader concept that encompasses various forms of confrontational behavior aimed at promoting an actor's interests '3'. Political conflicts may not necessarily involve violence but rather rely on other means such as protests, boycotts, and negotiations to achieve their objectives. In this sense, armed conflict is a specific type of political conflict where the use of force or threat of force becomes a primary tactic.

The distinction between these two concepts is significant in understanding international relations, peacebuilding initiatives, and humanitarian responses. Armed conflicts often involve state actors, non-state actors, or combinations thereof, which can lead to devastating consequences for civilians and infrastructure '4'. In contrast, political conflicts may be more nuanced and less destructive but still pose challenges for policymakers seeking peaceful resolution.

In conclusion, armed conflict is a specific type of large-scale internal struggle characterized by the use of organized opposition against government forces. Understanding this concept requires consideration of both scale and organizational structure, which sets it apart from other forms of violence or political confrontation. By recognizing these differences, researchers and practitioners can better address the complex issues surrounding international peace and security.

References:

'1'

'2' Armed conflict is understood to be large scale, internal to a country where an organised opposition movement is able to inflict fatalities on the government., Political Science

'3' Political conflict indicates a scenario where behavior of an actor (s) manifests itself in a confrontational way to promote their interests and try to stop other actors from obtaining their objectives.

Definition of armed conflict in political science jstor